Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Laura Hietaranta vs June Bjork Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hietaranta vs Bjork analysis and find out who is favored!
Laura Hietaranta vs June Bjork Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hietaranta 1 - 0 Bjork
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hietaranta has won 47.54% of points on their second serve, while Bjork has won 32.69%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hietaranta, in recent form, has won 59.75% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bjork has won 56.94%. The same stats for first serve returns are 45.03% and 45.79% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hietaranta has saved 53.47% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bjork has saved 46.49% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hietaranta has won 64.2% of matches played (W/L 52/ 29), with Bjork winning 46.88% (W/L 15/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hietaranta has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 69% (W/L 70/ 31), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 42% (W/L 8/ 11). Bjork has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 14/ 19).
- Player level: In the last year, Hietaranta has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.67% of matches (W/L 37/ 23), where as Bjork has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 15/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hietaranta winning 1 times and Bjork being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hietaranta winning 2 and Bjork winning 0. The last match between Hietaranta and Bjork was at the W15 Norrkoping, 25-08-2022, Second, Clay with Laura Hietaranta getting the victory 6-0 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hietaranta and Bjork have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hietaranta winning 0 times and Bjork 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hietaranta winning 0, and Bjork 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hietaranta has played against opponents with an average rank of 240.75 while Bjork has played against players with an average rank of 73.47.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hietaranta has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bjork has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hietaranta has converted 50.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bjork has converted 52.38% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
378
Rank
378
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
19
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
63% (94-55)
Career Total W/L
45% (22-27)
62% (23-14)
YTD W/L
42% (5-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Laura Hietaranta vs June Bjork For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Hietaranta VS Bjork
Sportsbook
Offer
Hietaranta VS Bjork H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Laura Hietaranta | June Bjork |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 0 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:9:0 | 1:9:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (31/42) | 41% (12/29) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (23/31) | 17% (2/12) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (5/11) | 18% (3/17) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 86% (6/7) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Points W% | 83% (24/29) | 33% (14/42) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Hietaranta VS Bjork H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-0 |
Stats 
Laura Hietaranta
Player
June Bjork
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
41%
(
12 of
29)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
83%
(
24 of
29)
52
Total Points Won
19
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Laura Hietaranta | June Bjork |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (23/14) | 42% (5/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (52/32) | 44% (12/15) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (418/339) | 47% (127/144) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 70% (16/7) | 42% (5/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.05 | 0.02 |
| Aces Total | 17 | 3 |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 0.69 |
| DFs Total | 106 | 91 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:8 | 1:44:20 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 247.78 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1511/2344) | 64% (463/723) |
| 1st Serve W% | 58% (879/1511) | 53% (247/463) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (396/833) | 33% (85/260) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (178/351) | 52% (55/105) |
| Return Pts W% | 50% (1184/2371) | 50% (387/775) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (16/12) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 78% (7/2) | 45% (5/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (23/37) | 42% (5/12) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 70% (7/10) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (4/10) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (22/20) | 83% (6/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (22/2) | 17% (6/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (15/3) | 0% (6/0) |
Laura Hietaranta Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Stephanie Wagner
Player
Laura Hietaranta
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Lilli Tagger
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Julie Struplova
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Elena Korokozidi
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
46%
(
21 of
46)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
3 of
25)
89%
(
8 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
49%
(
24 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Tamara Kostic
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Laura Hietaranta
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
8
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Sapfo Sakellaridi
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Tatiana Pieri
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
40 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Rositsa Dencheva
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
June Bjork Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Ria Dernikovic
Player
June Bjork
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lucrezia Musetti
Player
June Bjork
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
6
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
46%
(
25 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
64
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 2-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
June Bjork
Player
Maria Ivankovic
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
43%
(
36 of
84)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
8
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
16%
(
3 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
53%
(
33 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
47 of
84)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Carina Syrtveit
Player
June Bjork
56%
(
54 of
96)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
11
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
48 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
80
Total Points Won
84
|
1-6 7-6(3) 10-6 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacquline Nylander Altelius
Player
June Bjork
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
10
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
45%
(
23 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Garcia Cid
Player
June Bjork
91%
(
52 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
25 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
June Bjork
Player
Abigail Amos
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
-
Aces
-
12
Double Faults
8
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
33%
(
11 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
50%
(
50 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
95
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
June Bjork
Player
Carolina Mesquita
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
2
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
6
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
55%
(
36 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
47 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Monika Wojcik
Player
June Bjork
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
7
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Hietaranta Vs Bjork Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Hietaranta are available here and Bjork photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
